Connect with us


Israeli forces killed a Palestinian man in Jericho



Ahmed Ibrahim Owaidat

Palestinian Ministry of Health announced that the Palestinian man Ahmed Ibrahim Owaidat 20 Year killed after he was injured by Israeli forces’ fires in the Aqabat Jaber camp Tuesday at dawn in Jericho.

Besides, Three Palestinians were Injured last night, one of them was seriously injured during the storming of Israeli Arabists forces in Aqabat Jaber camp in southern Jericho.

Also Read: Israeli Democracy: Clarion, Brutal and Ugly

Also, Israeli forces launched a campaign of raids, arrests, and attacks after storming different parts of the West Bank, at dawn, on April 26. Dozens were injured and others detained.

And Israeli forces detained ten Palestinians from different parts of the West Bank.


Christians must not dance with Israeli apartheid under the guise of fighting anti-Semitism



It has been revealed that major Christian Churches in the UK succeeded in forcing former British Prime Minister Liz Truss, to reconsider earlier thoughts of moving the British embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

According to news reports, the Church of England, the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church strongly urged Truss to reconsider her ideas in this regard.

Cardinal Vincent Nichols, president of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales, reportedly sent a letter to Truss warning her against moving the British Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem,  which, according to international law, is considered an occupied territory.

Read also : Moving British Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is huge insult to 2 billion Muslims

 Cardinal Nichols probably reflected the views of his  fellow clerics when he warned that the relocation of the embassy would seriously damage British interests throughout the Muslim world: “A relocation of the UK Embassy would be seriously damaging to any possibility of lasting peace in the region and to the international reputation of the United Kingdom.”

Moreover, the chief cleric in the Church of England, Justine Welby, expressed a similar attitude in a newspaper interview.

 Predictably, Israeli leaders reacted furiously, accusing Christian leaders of ignorance and adopting an immoral stance toward the apartheid Israeli entity.

 Furthermore, one right-wing Israeli writer lambasted the three Churches which objected to the idea of relocating the British embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, claiming that the churches didn’t represent Christians around the world. He hinted that a Christian cannot be a true Christian unless he or she embraces the Israeli apartheid regime in the West Bank where non-Jews, e.g. Christians and Muslims, are treated as children of a lesser God, or using the biblical terms, as water-carriers and wood-hewers!

Interestingly, most extremist Israeli leaders subscribe to  the silly concept that the only authentic Christians are the evangelical groups, or the so-called Christian Zionists, who believe that the creation of Israel in Palestine in 1948 was a fulfilment of Biblical Prophecy and a precedent to the second advent of Jesus.

“The Hitler of  Bethlehem”

Jewish Extremists’ Attacks Rattle Christians in Holy Land

By the way, it might be appropriate to remind readers on this occasion that the Israeli government which claims to tend to and protect  Christian interests in Palestine is the very same government that pays hundreds of millions of Shekels to vehemently anti-Christian Talmudic colleges (Yishivot) that teach the filthiest possible hate literature, like Hesronot Shas, against Jesus Christ. I am not going to mention passages from this filth out of veneration for Jesus himself and as a gesture of respect for Christian brothers and sisters around to world. My ultimate goal behind these stunning revelations is not to incite Christians to hate Jews. In the final analysis, truth, not hate is my craft.

Before leaving this thread, I want to remind readers of an incident that occurred several years ago. Then I met an ostensibly moderate and respectable rabbi. And as we were speaking about monotheistic religions and the common grounds between them, the rabbi surprised me when he referred to Jesus, a figure I love so much as every other Muslim does, as “The Hitler of Bethlehem.”  The repulsive remark shocked me from head to toe, to say he very least.

Noticing my reaction, the rabbi said: I know that you Muslims venerate and sanctify Jesus, I am sorry if I have inadvertently caused you any offense.”

Venomous anti-Christian Hostility

Discrimination & Hate Crimes Against Christian Palestinians in the Holy Land

None the less, not all rabbis, especially in the West, are as honest as my interlocutor mentioned above. In fact, Zionist rabbis and other manifestly dishonest propagandists hysterically strive to distract attention from this colossal shame.

 Hence, they concoct all sorts of lies and disinformation about an alleged persecution in the Holy Land of Christians by Muslims and even by the unreligious Palestinian Authority (PA), which is absolutely and completely at Israel’s beck and call.

The truth of the matter is that the apartheid Israeli entity and Talmudic Jewish circles (the Pharisees of our time) are the only sources of harassment and persecution of al Palestinians, Christians and Muslims alike.

This unceasing persecution assumes many forms, including:1- Seizing land and real estate belonging to the churches, either by coercion or through suspicious purchase deals.

2-Routinly harassing Christian clergymen in the streets of East Jerusalem by spitting on them,  verbally abusing them or even bad-mouthing Jesus.

3-Denying Palestinian Christians in the Gaza Strip access to Christian Holy places in the West Bank such as The Nativity Church in Bethlehem and the church of Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem.

4-Occasionally vandalizing and setting churches on fire by anti-Christian Talmudic fanatics who often act on instructions from their government-paid rabbis.

5-Constantly seeking to stir  Muslim-Christian tension, using Shen Bet agents to carry out this filthy feat. Fortunately, 99% of these toxic efforts have utterly failed, due to the exemplary vigilance of the Palestinian community.

An Australian Blow

A few days before the resignation of Liz Truss,  the Australian government decided to reconsider its erstwhile decision to relocate Australia’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The decision was warmly welcomed by the Palestinians and the PA, which described it as consistent with the rule of international law.  However, the Australian decision drew much anger and consternation from the Israeli government and jingoistic media, with former Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu blaming current Prime Minister Yair Lapid for the reversal of Australian policy.


None the less, Christians are expected to show some justice toward the tormented Palestinians.

We all know that thanks to the grossly unethical and illegal western policy toward the Palestinian question, Israel has been given a carte blanch to murder, torment, savage and dispossess the Palestinian people. This utterly unfair and unjust policy by western governments, particularly the U.S. and UK, effectively condemned the Palestinian people to an unenviable situation that is similar to those proverbial orphan kids, sitting for dinner around the table of the cruel and the mean.

Hence, the gesture of the three churches in England is highly appreciated. We also sincerely hope that Church leaders will continue to raise their influential voices in defence of the virtually abandoned Palestinians. This would be consistent with the lofty Christian ideals of siding with the oppressed. 

Continue Reading


Moving British Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is huge insult to 2 billion Muslims



Truss considers moving British embassy in Israel to Jerusalem

The contemplated plan by British Prime minister Liz Truss to move her country’s embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Occupied Jerusalem is the ultimate insult to the Palestinian people and Muslims worldwide.

The evil and morally unjustifiable feat was disclosed less than 24 hours after the conclusion of Queen Elizabeth’s funeral in which several Arab and Muslim statesmen and dignitaries took part out of respect to their historical relations with Britain, which began even before the downfall of the Ottoman empire during the first World War.

Hence, any honest observer would have no qualms viewing Truss’s reported plan to move the British Embassy as a gesture of betrayal and profound ill-will to every Arab and Muslim under the sun.

Blatant act

UK’s Truss told Lapid her government was considering moving their embassy to Jerusalem

It is indeed hard to think of a single logical rationale justifying Liz Truss’s inherently racist insult. 

Indeed, the grave affront is by no means an aberration of British policy toward Muslims in general and the Palestinians in particular. After all, Britain has always embraced, either explicitly or tacitly  Israel’s Nazi-like policies of aggression and expansion against Palestinians, including the disgraceful apartheid regime now enforced in Palestine.

We all know that Britain’s record in dealing with Muslims, whether in the Indian sub-continent or, indeed, in Palestine,  is indelibly ugly, absolutely ignominious and irredeemably evil.

Religious hatred

In 1917, Britain’s timeless hatred of Islam prompted its government to issue the nefarious- infamous Balfour Declaration, which gave the  Palestinian people’s ancestral homeland to rapacious Zionist Jews on a silver platter.  Ever since that time, Britain never flinched from consolidating and expediting the colonial scheme of international Zionism while doing everything in its power to ravage and dispossess the Palestinian people, the ultimate victim of hateful British colonialism.

Read also: Britain is the original sin

Now, the new British premier Liz Truss is reportedly considering another shameless feat to further torment the Palestinian people and perfect the criminal usurpation of its inalienable rights.

The Palestinian people along with many Muslims around the world have been waiting rather desperately for over a century to see Britain take some corrective measures to atone for its gargantuan crime against humanity in Palestine. 

However, to our profound disappointment, Britain shamelessly continued its hostile policies against our people and its legitimate rights.  It is very sad, indeed, that successive British governments proved repeatedly that words such as justice and equity don’t exist in Britain’s lexicon.

Moving the British Embassy : Evil feat par excellence

The Balfour Declaration  is not just a contemptible historical document.

Indeed, despite the passage of 105 years since the issuance of the Satanic declaration, it is manifestly clear to those who have eyes to see and ears to hear that the Palestinian people are still suffering the indescribably harsh ramifications and repercussions of the Balfour Declaration.

Yes, the daily acts of murder, savagery, barbarianism,  home demolitions, land theft as well as all conceivable forms of  systematic, large scale repression meted out to our people around the clock would not have continued to this day had it not been for that evil promise.

Moving the British Embassy to Jerusalem is another Balfour declaration

The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British government in 1917 during the First World War announcing support for the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine

Undoubtedly the reported willingness of the new British Prime Minister Liz Truss to contemplate moving her country’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem constitutes a new Balfour declaration.

This is because the immensely provocative measure is tantamount to recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the holy city, a measure that the bulk of the international community has avoided taking rather meticulously due to the special sensitivity surrounding this matter.

I am talking about both East and West Jerusalem which, according to international law, is still designated as ” Corpus Separatum.”

Sovereignty can’t be acquired through military Force

Moreover, the argument that Israel’s decades-old military control  gives the Jewish state sovereignty over the city is absolutely worthless since sovereignty cannot be obtained through the acquisition of territory by way of military force. Otherwise, Russia would have the legal right to declare its sovereignty over eastern and southern Ukrainian territories occupied by invading Russian troops.

The reason I mentioned the Ukrainian analogy is because the manner through which predominantly  Arab Palestine was transformed into predominantly Jewish Israel  is almost completely identical to the manner through which Crimea, Dunbas and other territories in eastern and southern Ukraine have become Russian! It’s like tweedledum and tweedledee.!

The notoriously hypocritically west, including the US and the UK know this fact too well, but they lack the moral credentials to call the spade a spade.

Jerusalem is occupied territory

According to international law, East Jerusalem is still considered an occupied territory under international law.

Now, Liz Truss, the Pathetic latecomer is brazenly and without any semblance of Chutzpah displaying her brutal ugliness against the very people whose ancestral homeland Britain seized and gifted to the supremacist and ultra-racist Khazar Jews without even consulting with the natives of the land  as if they were children of a lesser God.

This is why, Muslims all over the world must leave no  stone unturned until this racist woman reverses her illegal, immoral and manifestly unjust plan to bless and  bestow legitimacy on Israel’s Lebensraum policies against the Palestinian people.

After all, Jerusalem, East and West, is occupied territory and recognizing the city as Israel’s capital is illegal immoral and starkly incompatible with the rule of international law.

 There is no doubt that the usurpation of Palestine and banishment of millions of its people at the hands of the Nazi-like Zionist gangs constitute the most enormous crime in the annals of history since Adam and Eve.

Read also: Even If A Hundred  Holocausts Were Committed Against Jews, It Gives Them No Right To Slaughter Palestinians And Steal Their Homeland

I know that many westerners, whose governments enabled  Zionist Jews to carry out their still ongoing Holocaust against our people , may not view the Palestinian plight this way. But so what? The West which has effectively adopted the Jewish holocaust as its de facto  religion has absolutely no moral right to lecture the Palestinians on how they should relate to their ongoing holocaust-like Nakba, just as westerners admit they have no right to challenge or even question the wild tales about the lamentable Jewish tragedy in the course of World War II.

Muslim dignity at stake

In conclusion, I would like to stress that Muslims everywhere must take proactive steps to punish the UK for its criminal defiance of more than two billion Muslims. Such steps must include, inter alia, a total boycott of all British products and commodities. This should be done even if our tyrannical regimes objected to our legitimate activism. This is because the collective dignity of more than 2 billion Muslims is at stake.   

Continue Reading


Regarding the Pain of Palestinians



Regarding the pain of Palestinians

In the last few weeks, horrific viral pictures and videos from Palestine flooded social media. The internet brought the untold sufferings inflicted on the people of Palestine by Israel into every home around the world. People perhaps uploaded these pictures on social media to make the world aware of Israel’s crimes in Palestine. They also amplified the pain that the Palestinians have been suffering from the last more than 7 decades.

Visuals from Palestine: The Element of Shock

The visuals coming out of Palestine are shocking. They have an element of shock in them. They contain pain in them. Israeli forces are shooting some Palestinian, they are beating and kicking another person. Someone’s house is being bulldozed and NGO offices are being raided. Some Israeli soldiers are ordering a few Palestinian kids to say “cheese” in the middle of the night while photographing them.  

An average social media user consumes such horrific pictures from Palestine every day. All those people around the world, suffering from any kind of oppression, can understand the pain of the Palestinians in these visuals. For others, who do not have a sense of the tragic, it ought to teach them the meaning of tragedy. 

The Meaning of Tragedy for Palestinians

There were times when America waged wars around the world and called them “invisible wars” or “forgotten wars”. These wars were invisible to the world because no information came out of these places. However, these invisible wars were invisible only to the world outside. They were pretty visible to the people on whom the war was being waged. The war in Laos was not invisible to Laotians.

The invisible wars provoked a need to teach the Americans and the people around the world the meaning of tragedy. America’s education system has resisted teaching the meaning of tragedy to students. The recent opposition to the teaching of Critical Race Theory in American schools endorses this point.

Also Read: Children of Palestine: A childhood lost to trauma without an end

The CNN Effect

It was the Vietnam War that taught some Americans the meaning of tragedy. The media played a huge role in this teaching. The television brought the pain of Vietnamese people into every American home. This phenomenon is widely known as CNN Effect. The CNN Effect provoked unprecedented protests in the US, forcing the government to end the war in Vietnam. 

Susan Sontag writes in her book Regarding The Pain of Others (2003), about the impact of photographs of the Vietnam War and Bosnia war on public opinion. She writes, “The first idea is that public attention is steered by the attentions of the media—which means, most decisively, images. When there are photographs, a war becomes “real”. Thus, the protest against the Vietnam War was mobilized by images”. While war photographs make war real for the spectator, protest photographs make protests real for the spectator by bringing images of the protests into their homes through daily newspapers or TV news. Having fed the spectators with the shocking photographs and having made the protest real for them, the media certainly does incite a spectator to think at least a little and dig deeper into the images. 

Also Read: Israel Palestine Conflict: How The Clash Have Taken Toll on Children’s Mental Health?

Palestine’s CNN Effect

Palestine also had its CNN Effect moment. When Israel waged war on Gaza from December 2007- January 2008, Kashmir had just started using the social media widely. It was perhaps the first time that Kashmiris were watching Israel’s crimes live on social media. One of the most widely circulated pictures those days was the picture of Israeli kids writing messages on rockets that Israel was launching against Palestinians. 

These pictures were shocking. Entire Kashmir was on the streets to express their solidarity with Palestinians and protest the war on Palestine. A lot of people were injured in these protests. It is not that Kashmiris had not expressed their solidarity with Palestinians before but for the younger generation, it was the pictures that made them aware of the pain of Palestinians. There have been protests many times after the 2007-2008 war on Gaza also. However, it would be safe to assume that with more visuals coming out of Palestine, the intensity of protests has decreased over time. At some point, Kashmiris became numb and insensitive.

Earlier, Friday sermons or Eid prayers would not go without the mention of Palestine. There was always a special mention of Palestine in almost all mosques across Kashmir but now one rarely finds Palestine being mentioned in mosques or Kashmir’s local newspapers.

Also Read: Jewish extremist and terrorist organizations in Palestine

Overexposure to the pain of Palestinians

The insensitiveness is brought about by overexposure to the visuals from Palestine. The overexposure seems to take the element of shock out of these pictures and videos. As Susan Sontag writes, “the hunt for more dramatic (as they’re often described) images drives the photographic enterprise”. It is “part of the normality of a culture in which shock has become a leading stimulus of consumption and source of value”. About the need for a shock in photography, Sontag asks “how else to make a dent when there is incessant exposure to images, and overexposure to a handful of images seen again and again”?

This phenomenon has normalized the oppression or pain of Palestinians. The visuals that should normally give goosebumps to one no longer do that. Its ability to provoke solidarity or protests is gone. The pain of Palestinians is no more worthy of shock because they are perhaps made for it. We see them being killed live and hence they have become killable bodies. Their killing has been normalized.

Continue Reading