An analysis of what actually happened
Well, well, well; the Dominic Cummings affair. It was inevitable really, that political figures were going to break their own rules.
It has recently transpired in the media, that Dominic Cummings travelled to his parent’s home in Durham, with his wife and child at the end of March. This is a family home located 130 miles from London, his residential home. Any travel at that time, unless for work, an emergency, or essential care; breached lockdown rules.
Marina Hyde of The Guardian makes an interesting proposal as to why Mr Cummings is still working.
According to Hyde, Cummings is Boris’s ‘ideas man’.
What is an ‘ideas man’ exactly? Dominic Cummings is a political strategist and he is the chief advisor to Boris Johnson. The relationship is obviously a close one.
If Johnson were to be without his chief advisor, where would he be? This is perhaps the reason Johnson has so far washed his hands over the Cummings affair and deflected any suggestion for Cummings resignation.
The backlash has been real. Cummings has received a tyranny of anguish in light of his actions.
It is unfair to say the backlash is built upon the pent-up frustrations that have been felt up and down the country. The criticism is real and deserved, and hugely relevant at this time.
Was there justification within Cummings decision?
It is said the political advisor fled to his parent’s home in Durham when both his wife and child fell ill with Covid 19.
However, why would travelling to a parent, likely over the age of 70, ever be a good idea?
It would be a miracle if either parent did not fall ill after receiving such visitors. Not to mention if it is likely to have survived it within the confines of their own home.
It is said that Dominic Cummings is behind, to a large extent, the political decision-making of this recent pandemic. He was crucial to the ‘Get Brexit Done’ campaign and is believed to have coined the term.
This is of course the campaign that put Boris in political power. It can be understood why Boris is reluctant to let go of his valuable strategist, not just advisor.
It is also not surprising that ministers like Michael Gove stand by the strategist, while Cummings worked closely alongside the minister, during his time as education secretary.
Cummings is, however, a little bit of a rebel. This probably does not come as a surprise. Yet, Cummings has made a career out of upturning Whitehall ministers, who do not cut. This is Cummings idea of who should, and who should not be in government. He believes most of those in power, do not have the intelligence to lead the country and are backed only by their privilege.
He is not the first to think this. It is humorous however that such a figure ends up in the media, accused of exactly this. It is widely believed that Dominic Cummings writes one rule for everyone and another rule for himself. Public opinion sits on Cummings seeing himself ‘above the rules’. Similar to his Whitehall friends he so dislikes.
Of course, it is crucial to look at the facts and keep in mind-has this whole thing has been blown out of proportion?
Cummings and his family left their home in London around the 27th-30th of March. This was 4 days after the lockdown began. Even though lockdown is a lockdown, and travel beyond the excusable is breaking the rules, it was at the very beginning.
I think there may have been quite a number of individuals within Britain who travelled back home, during the beginning of this lockdown pandemic.
Although, I have to ask myself: if I wrote the rules, would I not be the one to uphold them?
There is nothing to say why a middle-aged man and his wife cannot deal with the situation at hand, by themselves.
Are they so unfamiliar with the meaning of ‘family’ that they are unable to foresee a reality, in which they take sole responsibility for child care?
This could be what is at play here.
The modern family does have a struggle mitigating the notion of child care. Before lockdown came into force, I was working at a nursery. Some of the parents at the nursery were having a hard time facing up to the responsibility of child care without the nursery’s help. One father exclaimed to a nursery assistant:
“My wife is on maternity leave-what are we meant to do?”
The notion of the family dynamic seems to be on a part-time basis. The father was not alone in this attitude.
Yet, is this a fair surmise of Dominic Cummings?
The BBC provide a thorough breakdown of the information supplied by Cummings. It transpires the strategist was worried for the health of the child if he and his wife were to fall gravely ill with Covid 19.
His wife had contracted the disease at the end of March, and it is reasonable to understand the worry Cummings must have had, in himself falling ill. He had been of course surrounded by ministers who had tested positive, and this was at the very beginning of the pandemic. Tensions were high.
If he were to come down with it, there may not have been sufficient child care for their son. And they felt unable to ask anyone in London to take on the duties. They fled to Durham to isolate themselves, and apparently, this was within a self-contained building on the property. This meant the parents could stay separate from the family.
This is not the media report I have heard this so far. It does seem a little radical that such a high-ranking official, would not have had the means to child care in London. It also seems strange that this was all done before Cummings fell ill if he even did.
Common sense would suggest Cummings have fallen ill before his wife, rather than later. It is likely to have been Cummings has passed on the virus to both his wife and child.
As it developed, Cummings wife recovered and Cummings fell increasingly ill. Cummings wife was able to look after the child. Cummings struggled to get out of bed.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing though. Looking at this from all sides, Cummings did appear to act in haste. To give him his due, however, he has been witness to the zombie apocalypse taking over Westminster.
He is a strategist after all, and when that is the suit in your hand, that is the suit you will play.
Dominic Cummings is not a criminal. His actions are understandable; perhaps frantic but understandable.
The trip to a castle 25 miles from his family home, undoubtedly broke the rules. He was taking the virus to another part of the country. The North East of England is one of the worst affected areas in Britain.
Yet, Cummings further explains this outing as a short drive, to ensure he was safe to drive back to London. It did not involve anyone leaving the car for an extended period of time.
Although testing one’s driving, on a limb, is not recommended; his intentions were genuine. He had been isolated for 14 days and his job needed him back.
I think it is important to remember, that Carrie Symmonds left No.10 and travelled to her mother’s house to self-isolate. It later transpired she had contracted Covid 19.
With hindsight, however, and I think the media need to take this bitter pill, this man has been made a scapegoat. His actions were just there was a reason.
It is shameful how he has been treated, and I regret the ministers defending him, were not quicker to relay the facts; so that we can all move on.
How China’s Zero COVID Policy Killed Thousands in Shanghai?
Under China’s unbending virus control policy, the country’s most populous city, Shanghai is under full lockdown. In addition, an atrocious policy in place by the ruling regime is separating young children and babies from their parents when tested positive for COVID-19.
But, what has led one of the most developed cities to the nightmare, it is living in today? How China’s Zero-COVID policy is killing thousands across the nation? And is there a way out?
Shanghai and Zero COVID Policy: The Unfolding Nightmare
On many fronts, Shanghai, one of the biggest city globally, is under a strict lockdown. Amongst the deserted market and streets, over 26 million residents are confined to their homes and breaking through the silence, the drones dictating restrictions and instructions of the locked citizens.
Shortage of food, water, and medicines, over-burdened delivery network, and growing protest to open the lockdown depict the chaotic picture of Shanghai. But, Shanghai is not alone; across China, some 23 cities, homing 200 million people are living under full or partial lockdowns.
The impact closure poses a severe impact on the Chinese economy and global supply chain. The lockdowns in the first wave of COVID led to a historic collapse in economic activities in China, and now with the Omicron lockdown, indicators are plunging again.
But, despite the draconian lockdown and security measures, new COVID cases are shooting off the roof, reflecting the high transmissibility of the mutated virus.
What is China’s Zero COVID Policy
As one of the strictest steps taken toward curbing the spread of the contagious virus, China has once again adopted the Zero COVID policy.
The matric watched the number of cases found among people who aren’t yet in quarantines. Unfortunately, this figure may continue to climb in Shanghai, and the authorities will consider an outbreak contained until the indicator known as Zero infection in society reaches zero.
The current approach tries to reduce transmission and extend the time available.
China believes that removing sick people from society is the most effective way to stop the spread of the disease. Still, quarantine facilities are divisive, producing widespread concern and terror among residents.
The primarily variant resulting in the situation is China’s low vaccination rate for the elderly, especially amongst the most vulnerable category of citizen over 80-years-old( a little over 20%). Furthermore, to add fuel to the fire vaccination campaigns have been slowing down dramatically.
How Bad is the Situation in Shanghai?
Shanghai’s local government has some special autonomy under President Xi Jinping’s China; as a province-level city, it is officially under the supervision of the central government, but it has a unique status as the country’s financial capital and an emblem of China’s accomplishments for the rest of the world.
The local administration had managed the pandemic adequately up until March, with no major breakouts. However, the quick arrival of the Omicron variety and the severe government actions accompanying it are pushing some residents to the edge.
Shanghai reported 27,719 new infections on April 14, a new record high for daily cases. But, astonishingly, 95% of these new infections are now among people in quarantine or living within a closed-loop system. The government has been testing the entire city’s population every day, and anyone who tests positive is removed from their homes and sent to centralized quarantine facilities.
The Chinese political leadership has put itself in a difficult situation by emphasizing the zero-COVID goal. If it persists, it will hamper the country’s economic recovery by exacting expenses that the people no longer consider justifiable.
However, if COVID-19 restrictions are relaxed, illnesses and fatalities will skyrocket as the virus spreads across a population lacking the protection observed in most other comparable nations.
When Will the Lockdowns End?
Once the zero COVID is achieved, Shanghai can start reopening the city. There is no timetable on when this can be achieved; however, with the new cases rising every day, it is most likely that the nightmarish lockdowns can continue for several more weeks.
Also Read: End of the Pandemic: Can We Live with COVID?
But, people are frustrated, mentally exhausted, and begging to get out. For many, this ordeal will shift how they view China as the future. While different variants of COVID killed millions around the globe, China remained a safe haven.
But, now the tables have turned.
The Urgent Needs for a Dynamic Zero-COVID Policy
Though the Chinese authorities will ultimately get the situation in Shanghai and around the country under control, the collateral damage created by the rigorous lockdown much outweighs the actual deaths inflicted by COVID at the moment.
As more cities in China sweep under lockdown, the country may again be cut off from both the inside and the outside. Moreover, what residents have gone through for the past few weeks can negatively impact their physical and mental health. As a result, the government must likewise place a premium on citizens’ mental and physical well-being.
The most vulnerable individuals should be vaccinated first, and strong safety measures should be put in place to allow regular life to continue in the state. Without these changes, the country’s economy would plummet, local firms would be forced to close, unemployment will soar, and public opinion will shift.
As a result, it’s critical to implement a dynamic zero-COVID policy that allows residents to normally go about their daily lives.
End of the Pandemic: Can We Live with COVID?
Sajid Javid, UK’s health care secretary, warns COVID could be here forever. Many European countries are calling for a new approach, claiming the infections must not be dealt with as a health emergency but an illness. So, is the pandemic approaching its end? Is it time we learn to live with COVID?
Pandemic to Endemic
After two years of multiple crippling waves, strict lockdowns, and millions dead, several countries are ready to leave the pandemic in the past. The new Omicron wave is breaking infection records across the world, but the hospitalization need and deaths are way down compared to previous waves, especially for vaccinated individuals.
The low mortality is sparking hope in many health care experts that COVID infections can now be treated as an endemic. We have learned to live with many illnesses in the past, and officials are proposing to add COVID to the list.
Despite the skyrocketing infections, many countries are easing the curbs, while countries like Ireland and the U.K. are dropping most of the restrictions.
Contrary to the European countries, the World Health Organization is declaring the pandemic far from over. According to the officials, the death rate of the current variant is still too high to go easy on the infections.
“Now is not the time to give up on the strategy. The virus (omicron) is circulating at a very intense level around the world.”Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, American epidemiologist
The Forever Pandemic
Omicron complicates the question of when this pandemic will end, but pandemics do eventually end. Yet coexisting with a virus as contagious as the Coronavirus would not be as easy as flipping a switch.
As an exhausted world tries to stem the spread of the ultra-contagious omicron mutant, cases are at an all-time high and causing chaos. However, this time we won’t have to start from scratch.
Although vaccines do not always prevent mild infections, they offer strong protection against serious illness. Omicron does not seem to be as dangerous as some earlier variants. Those who survive it will have a chance to bolster their defense against other variations of the virus that are still circulating. And perhaps the next mutant will emerge, too.
It won’t be long before the World Health Organization determines when enough countries have curb COVID-19 cases sufficiently – or at least, deaths and hospitalization have fallen – to officially deem the pandemic over. However, the exact threshold is unclear.
In that case, some parts of the world will still struggle – particularly those without enough vaccines or treatments – while other parts will be able to transition more easily to what researchers call an “endemic” state.
Could More Deadly Variants Emerge?
The coronavirus is not certain of remaining less deadly: It might evolve again and become more dangerous. Scientists in Sweden share that concern, writing in an opinion piece for POLITICO: “Allowing large amounts of contamination to circulate is like opening Pandora’s box of unpleasant surprises. The last variant we have seen is hardly the last.”
According to Professor David Heymann of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, there is always the risk of a dangerous mutation. However, he noted that the high level of immunity in the U.K. should guide a different approach. We should perform our own risk assessments instead of relying on top-down decision-making methods like lockdowns. You could, for instance, test yourself before leaving the house for dinner, or avoid potentially infected people if there is a risk, says David.
“The pandemic is no where near over. With the incredible growth of Omicron globaly, new variants are likely to emerge.”Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General WHO
Fighting & Living with the COVID
Despite the fact that industrialized nations actively aim to protect their populations by boosting their vaccinations for adults and extending vaccinations to children, we can no longer expect to inject people every four to six months in the face of new variants. To counter this threat, vaccinations will have to be provided annually – preferably with products that are effective against all types of Coronaviruses – and repeated exposure to an infection that is certain to become endemic sooner or later.
In the world “living with COVID,” governments and regulators should encourage the innovation of new vaccine technologies that will complement Moderna and BioNTech/Pfizer’s mRNA products duopoly. Furthermore, more investment should be made in antiviral drugs that might play a greater role in suppressing symptoms among infected people.
At the beginning of 2020, we might have had a slim chance of eliminating Covid-19, but they are long gone. Controlling the pandemic has been justified so far as a global health emergency; however, they cannot continue forever.
Too many collateral damages would result, including harm to social cohesion, mental health and wellbeing, and the global economy. Sars-Cov-2 and its descendants will require more resilience in the coming year so that the most vulnerable can be protected while causing less disruption.
Plastic Pollution: Environmental Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic
2020 was supposed to be the “Supper Year” for nature. The world was all set for major opportunities to bring nature back from the verge. And then the catastrophe happened, Coronavirus, setting long-held plans for battling climate change back. And, now the pandemic is adding more complexities to the already dire crisis: Plastic Pollution.
2022: The New Dawn
After falling significantly due to the great lockdowns, Carbon Dioxide emissions are expected to return to the pre-pandemic level in 2022. China has already surpassed its emission due to the extensive use of coal.
The coronavirus crisis has only given the environment a small intermission. Now an unprecedented consumption boom, encouraged by the leaders to boost the economy, is fueling the demand. Furthermore, as a safety measure, people have started avoiding public transportation and driving more.
But, the most visible legacy of the pandemic, plastic waste, is filling water bodies with toxins.
Masks: Life-Saving Plastic Pollution?
Do you wear masks? How many masks do you own? Are all your masks reusable?
The recent popularity of masks has made them an integral part of our lives. Without a shadow of a doubt, it saves lives and protects us from infections. Yet, the disposal of used masks has been sparking major waste management and plastic pollution discussions worldwide, especially in South Asia.
A new form of wastes is now turning up into the ocean, masks. Whether higher-grade respiratory masks or basic surgical masks and single-use gloves, these used clinical wastes all belong in incinerators. According to an estimate, over 1.5 million plastic masks ended up in oceans. just in 2021.
Face masks, gloves, and wipes are composed of a variety of plastic fibers, primarily polypropylene, which remains in the environment for decades, possibly centuries, forming smaller and smaller microplastics and nano plastics. According to a study in Environmental Advances, one face mask releases as many as 173,000 microfibers per day into the sea.
Single-Use Plastic Packaging
In spite of the closure of physical shops and financial uncertainty, online sales of goods are on the rise even though consumption (and packaging) may have declined overall. There has been an increase in the use of plastic and another single-use packaging for parcel deliveries from e-commerce.
Also during the lockdown, there has been a decline in the use of single-use plastic containers for food. As many restaurants have shifted to takeout services, packaging has increased and commuting, traveling, and leisure activities decreased. This may have reduced the demand for on-the-go food and drinks.
But the staggering spike in at-home deliveries, drying up recycling market, and economics of plastics have added more to the complexities.
Efforts to curb plastic waste have come at a complicated time with regard to PPE litter. The ocean’s plastic waste is expected to triple, and there is no clear solution in sight. However, the shift would reduce the projected tripling of plastics by just 7 percent if every corporation kept its pledge to use more recycled plastics.
Due to the pandemic, disposable packaging has also increased as people purchase more takeout food. Plastic bag bans have been suspended because of fears that reusable bags will spread the virus. Similarly, a third of recycling companies in the United States have closed due to cash-strapped municipal budget cuts.
Elevated Plastic Pollution
Even before the pandemic, South Asia was the largest source of plastic wastes. India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh are amongst the top 20 countries notorious for creating the most mismanaged plastic waste.
The Ganges and Indus, flowing through these countries, are listed as some of the most polluted rivers systems, swallowing over 90% of the region’s plastic waste. A report from Washington Post reveals that the world has created about 8 million tons of plastic during the pandemic, most of which are now in the oceans.
Littered masks and gloves are carried like tumbleweeds into rivers and streams, where they reach the sea. As a result, the presence of sea turtles has been documented on beaches in South America, river outlets in Jakarta Bay, in Bangladesh, on the coast of Kenya, and on Hong Kong’s uninhabited Soko Islands. In addition, wasted personal protective equipment has clogged street drains from New York City to Nairobi and is clogging Vancouver, British Columbia’s municipal sewage system.
Plastic Pollution: No Silver Bullet
Now, entering 2022, the super year for nature is still on the waiting list. A single silver bullet can’t solve the plastic pollution problem globally across the rivers and oceans. For sustainable production, management, and disposal, plastics require interventions at all stages of their lifecycle: from production and preventing contamination to solid waste management and transitioning to a circular economy.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, plastic pollution has been exacerbated in Asia. The World Bank is working to reduce plastic pollution in South Asian nations for the billions of people whose livelihoods rely on clean rivers and seas. However, to recover from the pandemic in a greener and more resilient manner, countries, especially the most vulnerable ones, will need new policies, investments, and innovations.
Featured3 years ago
The Unfortunate Correlation between Race and Covid 19
Featured2 years ago
Practical Ways to Fight Depression in Islam
Featured2 years ago
Forget About Terrorism, Have You Met Cybercrime?
Featured2 years ago
The Connection Between Muslim Prayers (Namaz/Salah) and Yoga Poses
Featured2 years ago
Protecting half the planet: a potential solution for climate change and endangered species
Featured2 years ago
Monsoon Floods: A Recurring Hazard
Featured2 years ago
NASA And SpaceX Collaborate On A Historic Mission
Featured2 years ago
The Islamic Art